>Nathan Newman wrote:
>
> > Let's be clear in the double standard involved.
>
>Yes, by all means, let's! The double standard is that when UFPJ declined to
>nominate someone who attacked ANSWER falsely as anti-semitic, you attack them
>for us and bait me about this policy.
who baited you? reminding you of comRod cox's position of baiting. according to his very excellent remarks, how did nathan bait you?
>But if a rally organizer declined to
>nominate someone from WWP to speak in deference to Democratic
>officeholders on
>the stage, you would defend that policy.
yeah, so? this is about ending the war, and thus who can reach the most people. if WWP rants put people to sleep and having the stamp of some dem in office--signaling a break with dem policy thus far--is going to get more interest from people, politicians, the media, etc.
kelley