Please keep us posted with what you find.
Thanks, Diane
At 09:20 AM 2/20/2003 -0500, Kelley wrote:
>i still haven't figured out who it was that i was listening to on NPR the
>other night. i caught while in the car, so missed the intro, was
>distracted by driving, and talking with the kids. the guy who was on had
>been an activist in the 60s while at seminary, IIRC. was talking about how
>he and others like him were marginalized as radicals in that environment.
>i'm going to call the station today to find out, just to satisfy my curiosity.
>
>at any rate, he was on the show representing Win Without War which, as I
>said yesterday, is probably going to be the big 'winner' in this war you
>guys are having over who is actually going to win "hearts and minds." heh.
>
>http://discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1166885 (notice their
>rhetoric here. we're mainstream, those other groups are fringe weirdos.
>unfortunately, that's going to work. they're not necessarily describing
>folks as reds, just weirdos.) let the slashing begin. weeeeeeee.
>
>win without war's Janeane Garofalo was also on CNN last night. both fox
>and cnn covered them. had to cover them and had to talk about them as "not
>kooks" :) and, to that end, they legitimated this group, even as they
>tried to discredit them.
>http://www.winwithoutwarus.org/
>
>they are also spearheading the campaign to fax/email/phone in your protest
>on Feb 26th. (GW I broke out on 2/23, a Monday, right?) and, they're
>behind the big media push of celebrities. www.moveon.org
>
>Win Without War has taken advantage of some massively huge organizations.
>whatever you think of those organizations and whatever you think of WWWs
>message, they have resources and infrastructure that can be mobilized
>rather effectively. they know how to run PR campaigns.
>
>i'm not saying that is what the left should be doing. what i am saying is
>that this is new territory folks.
>
>the reason why it intrigues me is akin to something, i think, carrol said
>yesterday. basically, people begin where they are, and in the course of
>struggle, their views become more radicalized. or, at least, they can.