----- Original Message -----
From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu>
> Lenin did not have much time to arrive at his embryonic analysis of
> imperialism: he had a world war on his hands and almost the entire
> leadership of the world's workers had finked out and was cheering on the
> slaughter. So he got an awful lot wrong, and left out a lot more, and
> there is still today room for developing a better analysis. But he got
> it right where it counted: imperialism is the mode of existence of
> capitalism.
>
> Carrol
=================
Evil is a bad thing.
So, if that subset of the USG that the Repugs adore using everytime they are in office backs down from exercising the death machine would that be a choice or just a feint in the deus ex machina called imperialism? Yes, I know the Dems. are worse.
Any socialism that didn't take over the entire planet in 5 minutes would by it's very constitution also be an imperialistic system until it had replaced those pockets of the global political-ecology-economy still under the sway of capitalism. Would that be a bad thing? Is only one kind of imperialism bad?
Ian