subject change
joanna bujes
joanna.bujes at ebay.sun.com
Wed Jan 22 14:02:06 PST 2003
At 03:52 PM 01/22/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>My point, which I thought was easy enough to understand, is that referring
>to Israeli and US nukes says nothing about allowing Iraq to get them. I
>mean, if he stays in power, he's gonna want a few. Right? So the question
>is, should he be allowed develop a small arsenal? The feeling here seems to
>be, so what, no big deal, Israel and the US are worse, blah blah blah. I
>mean, if you don't care that Saddam gets nukes, at least say it openly and
>don't dodge the issue by going on about Sharon and Bush.
Going to war with a country because they might get nukes is insane. Using
Iraq for target practice (for the last ten years) is criminal. Supporting
Israel's genocidal, anti-democratic, destabilizing policies is
stupid/wrong/criminal.
In short, when I look at the Middle East, Saddam is the least of my worries.
Joanna
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list