[lbo-talk] Re: Nader:

snit snat snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com
Wed Dec 15 08:24:11 PST 2004


At 10:59 AM 12/15/2004, Tommy Kelly wrote:


>>From: snit snat <snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com>
>>
>>
>>>Perhaps you just mean what RN was saying was without substance?
>>>
>>
>>no. maybe it's just that it's old hat to me. yeah, wow, the two parties
>>are, like, totally the same. really? wow.
>>
>>i can't remember what the question was, all i know was that he didn't
>>answer it. instead, he went on and on about how the democrats spent a ton
>>of money to keep him off the ballot. boo fuckin' hoo. i'm with nathan:
>>the point is to win and the democrats pursued whatever means they could
>>to win. similarly, the republicans pursued whatever means they could to
>>win. crying about that seems totally pathetic, especially when ralf
>>appears to have turned a blind eye to the fact that republicans were
>>funneling money into his campaign (in an effort to do whatever they could
>>to win, as well). whatever.
>>
>>
>If you are talking about Ralph Nader's interview on Democracy Now!, you
>are going over the top.

My work here is done!

Kelley

"We live under the Confederacy. We're a podunk bunch of swaggering pious hicks."

--Bruce Sterling



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list