kj khoo
At 10:05 am -0600 26/2/04, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>That was not the position of the Roman church even before Vatican II. (For
>the ecclesiastical-minded, see DS 3866-3873.) --CGE
>
>
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Jon Johanning wrote:
>
>> ...The background to this is that, since the Council of Trent in the
>> 16th century, which was responding to the Reformation, the official
>> Catholic position was that the Catholic Church was the "body of
>> Christ," meaning that if you were outside that "body" Christ couldn't
>> save you. The 2nd Vatican Council in the early 1960s became much more
>> inclusive, but old Mel, going with his sect's rejection of Vatican II,
>> feels he has to condemn his own wife to hell-fire (or at least
>> purgatory, I suppose -- I don't know old Mel's position on the exact
> > arrangements in the hereafter)...