[lbo-talk] Film, "The Battle of Algiers" playing in Cambridge, MA

Jim Farmelant farmelantj at juno.com
Sat Feb 28 11:10:56 PST 2004


Below are two reviews (respectively from the Boston Globe and the Boston Phoenix) of the 1965 film, "The Battle of Algiers", which is currently playing at the Kendall Square Cinema in Cambridge.

Jim F. ----------------------------

The Battle of Algiers

'65 classic 'Battle of Algiers' still electrifies and challenges

By Ty Burr Boston Globe Published: 02/27/2004 http://www.boston.com/movies/display?display=movie&id=5332

A Muslim country seething with discontent. A Western occupying force using strong-arm tactics to root out a terrorist army. Women with bombs in their handbags. Tanks in the streets.

Contrary to what you're thinking, this is Algiers in the mid-1950s. The film is Gillo Pontecorvo's 1965 classic "The Battle of Algiers," an electrifying, ground-level re-enactment of Algeria's struggle for independence from its French masters. For years the Pentagon has screened this film to military personnel headed for insurgent hotspots -- it was shown there as recently as August -- and if you go to see the gleaming new print at the Kendall Square starting today, you'll quickly grasp why. "Battle" is cauterizing in its evenhandedness, showing the vengeful madness and the passionate reason on both sides of the conflict. Nearly four decades old, it's the first must-see movie of 2004.

Pontecorvo came up through the Italian Neo-Realism boom of the postwar years, but he was first and foremost a documentararian. Both strains serve him well in "Battle." His camera is everywhere: in the torture cells of the French Foreign Legion; in the Casbah meeting rooms of the Algerian resistance organization, the National Liberation Front (FLN); at checkpoints; on rooftops; in cafes when the bombs go off. At times you have to pinch yourself to remember that every frame of the film was staged.

The casting, too, is realistic enough to shed blood. As central figure Ali la Pointe, a rangy street hustler who becomes a committed FLN fighter, Brahim Haggiag was picked from the crowd by the director, but Saadi Yacef, as Ali's recruiter Jafar, fought in the real uprising and wrote the memoirs on which Pontecorvo and co-writer Franco Solinas based their script. French actor Jean Martin was tapped to play the army leader, Colonel Mathieu, for his resemblance to the dapper, self-aware commander of the real French forces, Jacques Massu: It took an actor to play an actor.

Violence escalates in "Battle" with a horrible tit-for-tat logic -- an execution leads to an assassination campaign against French policemen which leads to the cops bombing the Casbah which leads to the FLN bombing racetracks and airports -- and only Mathieu, a theoretician of realpolitik, is willing to articulate the hard line. "Should France stay in Algeria?" he coolly asks a hostile reporter. "If you answer yes, you must accept all consequences."

Those consequences include torture, shown here without a blink. Mathieu may be unflappable, but his men aren't, and their anger is stoked by fresh memories of losing French Indochina. Nor does "Battle" idealize the FLN. One of its leaders may tell Ali that "terrorism is useful as a stunt," but that means nothing to a French teenager killed by a bomb, and when the FLN mounts a moral cleanup of the Casbah and a group of kids subsequently hound a drunk to his death, you see the mob mentality that lurks even in the urge for freedom.

As "Battle" shows, the terrorist cells were eventually snuffed out, but mass protests several years later led to Algerian independence in 1962. The final shots of the film aren't so much a celebration of liberation as an acknowledgment of historical inevitability. The filmmakers are too fatalistic, or exhausted, to join the party.

Too much can be made of parallels with recent events in Iraq (for one thing, the French didn't go in with the stated purpose of unseating a dictator but were already there) but the chafing, mutually uncomprehending collision of Western occupiers and Muslim occupied has never been captured with such dispassionate, thrilling clarity. "The Battle of Algiers" is a thinking person's action film in which there are winners -- but no heroes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marxist poetry Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers BY STEVE VINEBERG ------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/reviews/documents/03625248.asp

The Battle of Algiers (1965) Directed by Gillo Pontecorvo. Written by Pontecorvo and Franco Solinas. With Brahim Haggiag, Jean Martin, Yacef Saadi, Samia Kerbash, Ugo Paletti, and Fusia El Khader. In French with English subtitles (117 minutes). At the Kendall Square.

------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Writing admiringly about The Battle of Algiers, Pauline Kael called its director, Gillo Pontecorvo, "the most dangerous kind of Marxist, a Marxist poet." She was right: this gripping 1965 movie, which may have invented the docudrama form, has been used as a training film by organizations around the world that think of themselves as freedom fighters — and by their opponents. It’s hard to think of a political film that’s proved more effective since Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will. Set in Algiers between 1954 and 1960, both inside and outside the Casbah (the Arab ghetto that Julien Duvivier’s romantic 1937 melodrama Pépé le Moko made famous to international audiences), Pontecorvo’s movie chronicles the struggle of the Algerian people for independence from their French masters. Its collective hero, the National Liberation Front, is embodied in the figure of Ali-la-Pointe (Brahim Haggiag), a petty thief who’s radicalized in prison by the execution of an NLF inmate. But its spokesman, in a brilliant strategic move by Pontecorvo and co-writer Franco Solinas, is Colonel Mathieu (Jean Martin), the imported French officer in charge of the counter-revolutionary campaign, who phrases the Marxist arguments that his enemies act out by instinct.

Pontecorvo and Solinas don’t stoop to caricature to build their case against colonialism. Martin is not only articulate but elegantly civilized, and none of his men is a brute. When they capture members of the revolutionary cells, these captives are tortured with the cool indifference that accompanies professional efficiency. Pontecorvo’s camera barely takes in the torturers; it’s the faces of their victims he’s interested in — especially the hollowed, bony, sad-sack countenance of the man pummeled into giving up Ali’s hiding place. (Most of the picture is a flashback from the moment when Mathieu’s men corner Ali and three companions in the Casbah.) That’s also the case in the horrifying scene where a French bomb blows up a crowded apartment house and most of the bodies retrieved from the rubble are those of children. And the movie treats the racism of the white Algerians almost casually, as an inevitable consequence of the colonial system (a non-Marxist observer like Orwell might have depicted it in precisely the same way), refusing to use it to dehumanize them.

In the centerpiece sequence, the NLF sends three women out of the Casbah to pick up bombs and deposit them in crowded public places — the Air France terminal, a café, a milk bar where young people go to dance. Removing their veils, the women dress and make themselves up Western style so they can slip past the checkpoints manned by French policemen, and in this almost silent scene you can see what it costs them to violate their Muslim traditions. As each woman reaches her target, she looks around at the people she knows will be killed or maimed by the bomb inside her handbag — like a toddler at the milk bar licking an ice-cream cone. The three women’s faces are remarkably expressive, though they hold themselves absolutely in check. After they’ve departed, Pontecorvo lingers on these bystanders moving inexorably and unknowing to the last moment of their lives — the dancing teenagers, the laughing bartender. His acknowledgment that revolutionary action claims real victims, not just statistics, tears you apart, because he’s employed all his filmmaking skill to make the case that terrorism is the one of the few effective resources open to the NLF. Watching The Battle of Algiers — and especially this sequence — in today’s political climate doesn’t mitigate its power; if anything, it’s more disturbing now than ever.

When Mathieu finds Ali, the last of the NLF leaders to elude him, one of his colleagues remarks that at last they’ve beheaded the tapeworm, picking up on Mathieu’s own metaphor for the NLF from earlier in the film. It’s 1958. But two years later, revolutionary activity flares up again, first in the mountains and then in the city, and though an aerial pan across the nighttime Casbah reveals no one, we hear the Arab slogans of the men and the strange, shrill bird cries of the women from every corner. By 1962, Algeria has won her independence. The tapeworm turns out to be a phoenix.

________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list