> Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>> Call me an anti-consumerist puritan, but if your sexuality is
>> completely
>> dependent on shopping, I'm just not going to grant it the same level
>> of
>> human dignity status.
>
> Ok, you're an anti-consumerist puritan. It's none of your damned
> business, nor of the state of Alabama, or the federal courts.
Where do you draw the line between sexual fetishism and commodity fetishism, when the sex involves commodities?
John A