[lbo-talk] Re: Sexuality Under Seige or So What Else is New?

[John Adams]

On Saturday, July 31, 2004, at 08:07 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:

> Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>> Call me an anti-consumerist puritan, but if your sexuality is 
>> completely
>> dependent on shopping, I'm just not going to grant it the same level 
>> of
>> human dignity status.
>
> Ok, you're an anti-consumerist puritan. It's none of your damned 
> business, nor of the state of Alabama, or the federal courts.

Where do you draw the line between sexual fetishism and commodity 
fetishism, when the sex involves commodities?

	John A