Also, once the bishops come to make a statement like this they usually are loathe to revisit the issue for a while. So I score this as a major loss for the Republicans who forced the issue. Their wedge into the Catholic vote just got a lot smaller. And I believe evangelicals are outnumbered by Catholics, who amount to nearly a quarter of the electorate, and form a greater percentage in some of the Northeastern and Midwestern swing states, as well as the growing Latino vote in the Southwest.
-- Jim Cullen
>Isn't the Pope just a little behind the curve on this one? I do not
>currently and have never known any Catholics who gave the abortion
>issue serious weight in their voting considerations. Not that none
>of then didn't care about the issue, they just were not inclined to
>make it THE choice in selecting a candidate. That seems like a
>tactic generally reserved for evangelical protestants. That domain
>is obviously not theirs exclusively but I believe they far outnumber
>the Catholics in that camp.
>
>John Thornton
>
>>http://www.nathannewman.org/log/archives/001780.shtml#001780
>>
>>Vatican: Okay to Vote for Pro-Abortion Politician
>>
>>But possibly the most fascinating fact is that Vatican officials clearly
>>told the Bishops that voters are free to support pro-abortion politicans
>>without sinning, if they support them for other policies:
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk