This reaction pushes me very close to being convinced the Green Party (or Parties) is (or are) just not serious.
Doug
John Halle wrote:
>>Which reminds me - several people have said they were unpersuaded by
>>John Halle's account of why he didn't run for re-election. Any
>>further thoughts, John?
>
>I have known about Matt's decision not to run again since January.
>
>My response is congratulations.
>
>The continual denigration of the Green Party achieved its goal which
>was to create the widespread impression among potential supporters
>that activism within the Green Party (or any other organized
>electoral entity such as the Labor Party) leads, as you put it a
>while back, to "brain damage." As I wrote in my piece, Matt and I
>were doing what we were doing based on the hope-though not the
>expectation-that we might be contributing a "brick in the wall" for
>the only kind of politics which, we believe, has the potential to
>address the root causes of the problems we face.
>
>We began to recognize that we were not going to be successful in
>this capacity partly because of the effective propagandizing of
>people like yourself with access to the establishment progressive
>media. So we gave up. We both got better things to do with our
>lives. That's the long and short of it.
>
>So you won and we lost. Whether everyone else also lost is a
>question which others might want to do some thinking about.
>
>John
>
>P.S. I have yet to hear anything minimally intelligent from anyone
>who was "unpersuaded" by my account of my experiences, whatever that
>might mean.
>
>--
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk