> Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>>And to be frank, who gives a shit if you get a stronger antiwar "movement"
>>under Bush if you get a more pro-war government?
>
> It's about the movement, not about "winning," which is vulgar.
>
> Doug
Is this irony, Doug. If it is it is misplaced. Persuading people to support John Kerry does not sound like winning anything to me. It sounds like dissolving your critical voice into the pro-war mainstream.
Nathan fears an even more pro-war government than the one offered by John Kerry. 'more pro war'? Is that like 'a little bit pregnant'? War, in its nature, is one of those questions that you cannot nuance.