--- BklynMagus <magcomm at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> Lenin and the other revolutionaries in Russia were
> for free love.
> But somehow the movement was derailed and we got
> Stalin,
WrongO....Lenin was not for free love...the revolution went conservative way before Stalin took over. Remember his famous quip to Kollontai who argued that making love should be like drinking a glass of water: "Yes", said Lenin, "but that does not mean I should dip my cup into just any well"...(or something like that..I am paraphrasing).
-Thomas
===== The real world gives the subset of what is; the product space represents the uncertainty of the observer. The product space may therefore change if the observer changes; and two observers may legitimately use different product spaces within which to record the same subset of actual events in some actual thing. The "constraint" is thus a relation between observer and thing; the properties of any particular constraint will depend on both the real thing and on the observer. It follows that a substantial part of the theory of organization will be concerned with properties that are not intrinsice to the thing but are relational between observer and thing.
W. Ross Ashby
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com