>Lots of X are Y.
>
>Gee whiz.
>
>That also means that lots of X are NOT Y.
By the way, how do Marxian class categories fare under this critique? You're the one who wants to flatten all the contradictions within the working class, right? Or is that different.
>This thread represents a new low in deliberate banality on this list.
Feel free to debanalize by introducing another topic of conversation.
Doug