By that logic, not just scientists but no one else can reject religion, since, in your opinion, "true rejection" should entail not only rejection of actually-existing religions but also all possible religions (which are unlike actually-existing religions and which may never even come to exist). That's like saying that one can never reject X (e.g., capitalism), because rejecting actually-existing forms of X (e.g., capitalism) doesn't mean also rejecting other possible forms of X (e.g., capitalism) which may or may not come to exist. It doesn't seem possible to reject anything by your standard. -- Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/> * Monthly Review: <http://monthlyreview.org/> * Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/> * Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>