[lbo-talk] If Blair wins, what conclusions should be reached?

Shane Mage shmage at pipeline.com
Thu May 5 12:18:04 PDT 2005


If Blair returns, it will be with a vote barely exceeding one third of the non-abstainers. Proving only, and for the nth time, the anti-democratic essence of the Anglo-American "first-past-the-post" system.

Shane Mage

"Mortals immortals, immortals mortals,

living their deaths, dying their lives"

Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 62


>Events may swiftly make this irrelevant but still...
>
>
>During the run up to the US presidential election, on several
>occasions (at least
>two of which happened on Doug's show) Tariq Ali stated his belief that -- well
>known problems with the opposition candidates aside -- it was
>important to defeat
>the architects of the Iraq war, *to prove it can be done* and to demonstrate a
>clear NO! to the idea of preemptive war and the almost insanely
>absurd lies used
>to justify it.
>
>We know how things turned out in the US.
>
>Now Mr. Blair faces an election. A lot of blood stained water has
>flowed under
>the bridge since he co-signed War Plan Iraq. If he wins an
>*unprecedented third
>term* what lessons should we draw about people's tolerance of BS (or
>estrangement
>from a cause and effect understanding of reality) in not one, but two of the
>major Western democracies?
>
>
>
>.d.
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list