[lbo-talk] Re: language of contempt

Guest lbodownload at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 7 02:07:12 PDT 2006


--- JBrown72073 at cs.com wrote:


> Guest <lbodownload at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> (I've already said how I
> >> think men benefit, not evolutionarily but right
> now,
> >> from the slut charge
> >> against women.)
> >
> >Really now? Absent the stigma against female
> >promiscuity, seems het guys would get laid way
> more.
>
> Well, maybe, but people in ongoing relationships get
> laid more, as a recent
> survey showed. The stigma against sluts means women
> are more likely to try to
> stick it out in a relationship which they might
> otherwise leave. Bluntly, it
> means we'll put up with more shit from guys.

Actually I've rethought this, and it seems more likely to me that with NO stigma attached to sex, women everywhere would just line up to screw the same .01 percent of 11-foot tall billionaire fighter pilots over and over again causing all other paternal gene lines to fail in a single generation.

Ok I'm MOSTLY kidding.

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list