>
>This is reason # 104 that has been offered for disgregarding injuries done
>to women: That's, oh so... yesterday.... let's get on to the really
>important issues...
>This reminds me of early SDS dismissing feminism as "petty bourgeois," a
>concern that stands in the way of revolution.
>
>Jesse Lemisch
Are you claiming that the Apthetker case is a litmus test for determining if someone cares about injuries done to women? Or are you avoiding answering the question Doug asked about why the case is so important?