> tfast wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>From: Chuck <chuck at mutualaid.org>
> >>>
> >>>The ranting anti-gun zealots will ignore one of the obvious
> >>>counter-arguments to their call for more gun control. The VT killer
> >>>could have easily killed those students or more with other weapons. He
> >>>could have thrown grenades into the classroom. He could have thrown a
> >>>stick of dynamite. More easily, he could have planted charges in the
> >>>buildings and blown them up.
> >>
> > OK I call Bullshit! It is the right to bear arms not dynamite or
grenades.
> > The reason neither dynamite or grenades or charges were used is that you
> > need a licence to fucking get them. This gives the lie to "regulation
does
> > not work." it sure as hell does and that is why a gun was used.
>
> You really haven't debunked my point. I'm not talking about the "right"
> to bear arms, I'm talking about the practicality of banning guns in a
> society where many people own guns. It ain't going to happen and if guns
> were eliminated, crazy jilted loverboys would still find ways to kill
> their girlfriends and other people.
>
> Evidently the VT murderer got his gun back in March. The system worked.
> The brain of this kid wasn't working.
>
> Chuck
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk