[lbo-talk] Darfur: colonised by 'peacekeepers'

Russell Grinker grinker at mweb.co.za
Fri Aug 3 12:52:57 PDT 2007


You might not agree with what he argues but reading the article in its entirety I find it hard to accuse the writer of 'extremism'. You seem to have picked up on points in the admittedly inadequate précis I did of the introductory paragraph rather than the essence of his argument. As to trusting the UN any more than any particular national government - isn't it a bit naïve to assume it has some sort of relative autonomy from the big powers? I'm also not sure what 'self-styled radical groups' refers to.

[WS:] You are right. To me, totalitarianism is totalitarianism, and extremist idiocy is extremist idiocy - no matter in what ideological packaging it is coming. I am not particularly affected by the opinions of academic celebrities on that subject either.

As to the situation in Darfur that you are referring to - I have no opinion on it because I feel that I do not know enough facts to have one. Having said that, however, I generally tend to trust international organizations, especially the UN, more than I trust national governments, and decidedly more than any self-styled radical groups (the latter have practically zero credibility in my book.)

One more thing - is it a particular fad in the radical circles to address interlocutors by third person instead of the customary second person (i.e. "he" instead of "you"), or you just think that directly talking to people like me is beneath your dignity?

RG: I thought the third person was an accepted form of address in thus kind of forum. Maybe it is over formal but I think you're being too touchy about its use in this case.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list