I'll take churches before sex parties in my neigborhood, though I have no desire to particpate in either.
--- "Mr. WD" <mister.wd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But as attractive as the ACLU position is, another
> part of me doubts
> the feasibility of that approach. At some point,
> one's conception of
> the good kicks in and we need to say "we're right
> and they're wrong"
> -- sex parties are good and church is bad -- and
> advocate for policies
> to that effect. (Or, in the alternative,
> strategically support the
> libertarian approach until we gain enough political
> power to
> legislate our conception of the good).
>
> These are the only two coherent approaches, IMO.
> Unfortunately, both
> of them have serious problems.
> -WD
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Lyubo, bratsy, lyubo, lyubo, bratsy, zhit!
ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ËÞÁÎ, ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ÆÈÒÜ!
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs