On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> There are some substantial posts from me in the archives, which I wont
> try to dig up now, arguing that valuations which offer negatives are
> essentially an attempt to claim superiority to other people, and are
> therefore ethically suspect. The only ethically allowable judgments
> are
> positive judgments.
Who's the better poet? Edgar Guest or Ezra Pound? e.e cummings or John Milton. If the former in both pairs, or if it doesn't matter, then why did you devote much of your professional life to studying the latter?
Doug