Yahbut Jerry, Doug never misses a chance to be hostile towards Cox irrespective of the content of Cox's commentary.
> On 5/1/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 1, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> >
> > > James's idiotic query
> >
> > > I seldom read the whole of Heartfield's posts, or even the whole of
> > > what
> > > other posters post. His assumptions are too detached from reality to
> > > make his deductions from them of interest.
> >
> > Can you, for even just a couple of days, stop being so hostile?
> >
> > Doug
>
>
>
> Doug,
>
> I think you are a bit off-base here. James query was idiotic, impolite
and
> insulting. It is not hostile for Carrol to say so. I must admit that in
> this case he said so in defense of me but I think I would react the same
way
> no matter who used the kind of rhetoric James used.
>
> So to remind you James asks me, as if I am in favor of it, the following
> question:
>
> James" "Who would you like to put to the slaughter first?
> Let's start with the jews, or maybe gypsies."
>
> As I said above, this kind of rhetoric is simply unacceptable. It is
> disgusting.
>
> It is not Carrol you should reprimand for hostility. Anybody who calls
this
> kind of rhetoric idiotic and disgusting is actually being polite.
>
> Jerry
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk