On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:56 PM, John Thornton <jthorn65 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Who in our Govt. really believes my shotgun could be used to to any
> effect if the Govt. wished to impose martial law?
> Don't kid yourself indeed.
> The 2nd amendment really says nothing about individual gun ownership.
> It is about a collective right for militias not under federal control.
>
> All that said I don't believe gun confiscation is justified by the
> imposition of martial law.
>
> John Thornton
>
>
>
>
> Eric Draitser wrote:
> > finally something i agree with obama on, gun confiscation (aside from
> being
> > blatantly unconstitutional) is one of the key obstacles to the
> imposition of
> > martial law. please dont kid yourselves, martial law is coming the next
> > time there is a "terrorist attack" (whether or not you even believe that
> > 9-11 wasn't an inside job). all i know is, i dont want to end up in one
> of
> > those cute little FEMA concentration camps, and if they confiscate guns
> you
> > better believe that'll happen sooner rather than later.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> [also from the Politico piece]
> >>
> >> In the Senate, he and Clinton broke on one vote, in July 2006. Siding
> >> with gun-rights advocates, Obama voted to prohibit the confiscation
> >> of firearms during an emergency or natural disaster. Clinton was one
> >> of 16 senators to oppose the amendment.
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>