I don't know anybody at Alternet. As long as I have outlets that will pay, and very limited time, I don't have enough reason to write for free, except for all you kewl people.
Michael Pollak wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>
>> Well I think (and tried to say) he is marginally more progressive as far
>> as can be determined at this time
>
> So far you haven't made any defensible claims yet. You've only told us
> you've written them down but no one's seen them. We'd love to read them.
> No chance of you posting 'em, huh? Because it would get in the way of
> publication? Not even a blind link so we could read 'em and discuss them
> without letting the whole world in on it? You know you really want to
> talk about them with us, and we really want to talk about them with you.
>
> I know nothing about publication restrictions, and maybe you're right that
> sharing them with us would forever scotch your chances of publishing them.
> But I find it hard to believe when everyone keeps publishing the same
> articles over and over. And if what you really care about is exposure,
> can't you just publish them free somewhere with high exposure like
> Alternet?
>
> Michael
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>