I think the partnership is mostly fluff too, outside of the business aspects.
I have no opinion on boxing. :)
--- John Gulick <john_gulick at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> JG responds:
>
> Well, I agree. But that in and of itself doesn't
> preclude
> a deepening of the Sino-Russian strategic
> partnership.
> (Incidentally, I have come to believe that said
> partnership
> is largely bluff and fluff... although Washington DC
> seems
> to take it rather seriously.)
>
> But what inquiring minds really want to know: what
> did
> you make of the human rights atrocity that was the
> Klitschko-Ibragimov "fight"?
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest
> Loser!
> http://biggestloser.msn.com/
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Mataiotes mataioteton, eipen ho Ekklasiastes, mataiotes mataioteton, ta panta mataiotes.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs