On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Dmytri Kleiner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:04:59 +1100 (EST), Mike Ballard
> <swillsqueal at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Oh sorry, Dmyiti. I thought you were making claims about what
>> Marx had
>> written about what money was and I had just read this from CAPITAL
>> VOLUME
> I:
>
> No, just stating an assumption based on a very general
> understanding of
> Marx's
> position here.
>
> As I said, I not a Marx scholar.
>
> In any case, from the information posted here, it seems the only
> dispute is what is actually called "money."
>
> To me, money is is simply the memory of an economic exchange, no
> matter
> how it manifests.
>
> I don't believe that the problem with actually existing money is
> the fact
> that it circulates, as I and others have said, specialization of
> labour
> implies exchange. Rather the problem is a matter of limited
> circulation
> and supply, and rents resulting from the resulting scarcity, which
> some
> models of alternative currency could alleviate, i.e. RipplePay.
>
> Money is only a problem because too few people have it, IMO
>
> This, in my view, has more to do with distribution of productive
> assets,
> then
> any intrinsic feature of Money.
>
>> From what you and others have quoted, Marx seems to agree, he just
> wouldn't call alternative or community currencies "money."
>
>
>
> --
> Dmytri Kleiner
> editing text files since 1981
>
> http://www.telekommunisten.net
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>