O.K. Now we have it pruned down to a judgment question on which there can be honest (but not really debated) differences of opinion.
First, the premise: Both Clinton and Obama are war criminals and enemies of the working class. Either will head an evil administration which will cause millions of deaths around the world in the medium not to speak of the long (and perhaps even the short) run. That is a given. As Michael Smith says, Jesus-they're De ocrats!
So the question:
Will a large vote for a Black Man (regardless of how he performs in office) be a blow against racism? That is the case for Obama. It does not depend on any conviction as to what kind of administration he will head or what policies he will support. (Those policies will be destructive: that, as I say, is a given.)
Or, will a large vote for a woman (regardless of how she performs in office) be a blow against sexism (without being a vote FOR racism)? That is the case for Clinton. It does not depend on any conviction as to what kind of administration she will head or what policies she will support. (Those policies will be destructive: that, as I say, is a given.)
By focusing it this way leftists can express different positions as Obama or Clinton fans without casting aspersions on motives. (Please note: votes and or campaign activities of leftists will have no more effect on the outcome than do the wishes of Chicago Cubs fans as expressed in 7th-inning cheers. From a left perspective this is merely a sporting contest, which they cannot affect.) Those who _really_ support the Democratic Party of course are not leftists but liberals who will on occasion ally themselves with left causes.
Carrol