"well, max is an example of goofiness: suggesting obama doesn't have a worship of money."
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20080317/005248.html
****************
That's what I was alluding to. Not anything JT said. I said the Clintons worship money, re: the depredations of Pritzger discussion.
I do not think you go do community organizing fresh out of Harvard if you worship money. You do shit like serve on Wal-Mart's board.
The evidence for BHO's alleged worship remains to be offered. Having to prove he does not is silly. If you want to cast a stone, the burden of proof is on you.
John Thornton wrote:
> Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>> It was said that BHO worships money, period.
>> I asked if anybody could cite one fact about BHO attesting to this.
>> So far, bupkis.
>
> No Max.
> Worship of money was written by you.
> You wrote that:
>
> "The Clintons will never attack somebody like Pritzker, a potential
> donor, because they worship money."
>
> I then inquired what evidence you or anyone had the Obama was any
> different in his relationship to money and the moneyed class and so far
> was has been offered is, as you say, bupkis.
> I would love to see evidence that Obama has a different relationship to
> money and the moneyed class.
> It would thrill me absolutely shit-less.
> Unfortunately no one has been able to provide even anecdotal evidence
> for such a position.
>
> John Thornton
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>