On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:19 PM, shag carpet bomb <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
> carrol, of course, says there is no such thing as "the" left.
>
> WRT the platypus discussion is was a commonplace that the left is dead.
>
> Why is the left dead? is this a reference to the end of Grand Narratives?
>
> what are people talking about when they say "the left" is dead?
>
> sometimes, people have suggested some sort of coherence to leftist movement
> in the 60s. but then when i've read histories, i don't get the sense of
> coherence. what little bit i discerned in What is to be Done made me think
> that there wasn't much coherence then, either.
>
> why do we think there was some sort of coherence in "the left" in the past?
> was there? maybe i read too much history focused on contentions among
> leftists, but i'm hard pressed, thinking about those histories, to see any
> coherence, at least coming out of the 60s.
>
>
> shag
>
> --
> http://cleandraws.com
> Wear Clean Draws
> ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>