Hence the central Republican demand for "no extension of slavery" was an assertion of the Northern ruling group's claim, as the Southern rulers well understood. When the Republicans got control of the federal government, the latter withdrew - and were attacked militarily from the North, surely unjustifiably, in spite of all the crimes of slavery.
Incidentally, there was a rather interesting element in the Republican party after the Civil War that argued that their party to be consistent should be devoted to the ending of wage slavery. --CGE
On 4/29/10 1:31 PM, Joseph Catron wrote:
> I quote my friend Jack Ross of the American Conservative (from a Facebook
> thread):
>
> ... "I've no love lost for the Lost Cause, but the morality tale of the
> virtuous North is indispensable to the perpetuation of the American Empire.
> With the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln cynically transformed his war into a war
> against slavery no differently than Bush transformed the Iraq War in
> mid-course into a war to spread democracy. And if you believe that
> conscription is slavery, you must acknowledge that the heroic New York Draft
> Riots (really New York's War of Independence) was a greater revolt against
> slavery than any that took place in the South during the war."
>
> Curiously, this makes more sense than 95% of the commentary emanating from
> the left.
>
> -- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen
> lytlað."
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk