Several ads are for the military, actually.
I cut and past the ad, because there is a subscription cost:
Senior Political Analyst Employer: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010 Job Type: Gov't Affairs/Exec. Mgmt Description: Qualifications: 1- 3-5 years of campaign or political experience. 2- Superior writing skills 3- Strong analytical skills 4- Well organized 5- Attention to detail 6- Ability to consume tremendous amounts of information and discern what is most important 7- Good computer research skills 8- Computer skills (MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint) 9- US Citizenship Responsibilities: This individual works with the Deputy National Political Director to provide assessments of campaign and political trends in U.S. politics. 1-Track House, Senate, and Presidential races, as well as national political trends. Use available resources to analyze the competitiveness of races; keep the political department informed about trends and developments, write daily/weekly political briefings; [Please indicate the source of the job lead as The Brad Traverse Group (brad traverse dot com)]. produce materials for use in national and regional political briefings 2-Write AIPAC’s quarterly political race assessment magazine 3-Work with AIPAC’s regional offices to: track and provide analysis for congressional races; schedule candidate meetings and obtain pro-Israel position papers 4-Help educate candidates for office by keeping extensive records of candidate meetings and working with candidates/campaigns/consultants to get position papers 5-Manage political files by keeping position papers/candidate meeting forms organized and accessible. Job Location: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee 251 H St, NW Washington, DC 20001 Please submit your resume via email to hr at aipac.org. No phone calls please. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is an equal opportunity employer.
Is http://www.ilagardien.com My little space in the e-world: A profit-free zone :-)
________________________________ From: "farmelantj at juno.com" <farmelantj at juno.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 7:16:15 Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] ciao, 60
The reason why a Democratic president wouldn't do that is that such a move would upset the corporate backers of the Democratic Party. Furthermore, if a Democratic president did such a thing, then there would be no guarantee that the masses once mobilized ,would not demobilize once the president had accomplished what he had set out to do. That too would upset the corporate backers of the Democratic Party very much.
Jim F.
---------- Original Message ---------- From: "Mr. X" <from_alamut at yahoo.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] ciao, 60 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Why couldn't a president use his access to the media to call supporters into the streets and apply pressure against his foes? The real question is why Republican presidents got major bills passed and never needed 60 votes? The Dems are spineless cowards who deserve to lose.
peace,
Jim Davis Ozark Bioregion, USA, Planet Gaia http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=141735
----- Original Message ----
> From: Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com>
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 11:00:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] ciao, 60
>
> [WS:] I see it differently. Yes, he caved in, but he was a junior senator
> elected president with little political experience facing entrenched and
> seasoned political machine. What was he supposed to do, stomp his feet and
> scream?
>
> As I see it, the US political system is completely FUBAR - nothing short of
> total collapse can change it. The best anyone left-of-the-centre can expect
> of an elected politician is palatble political rhetoric, soothing words, and
> civilised discourse. Obama delivered that. Anything more is beyond the
> capacity of this political system.
>
> Listening to articulate and intelligent speeches of a thoughtful and a
> compassionate person instead of spiteful redneck drivel of a right wing
> bigot is th eonly change that is possible here, and belive me, it does make
> a difference as far as my mood is concerned.
>
> Wojtek
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Wojtek S wrote:
> >
> > He was basically backstabbed by
> >> his own party. His only fault was that he did not manage to rein these
> >> cocksuckers in.
> >>
> >
> > Huh? The guy courts Republicans, who still won't give him the time of day,
> > gave the right wing of his own party everything they wanted, and has
> > dispatched Rahm Emanuel to rein in the left wing of the Dems. How is any of
> > this backstabbing?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
____________________________________________________________ Diet Help Cheap Diet Help Tips. Click here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=gAqnryOSmzbFcN1-z5IcsQAAJ1DoEMrytxsVXKlEh0tvqeWlAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYQAAAAAA=
___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com