Your argument against the two state solution is that it's highly unlikely to
> happen.
Actually, I haven't yet offered my argument against it, which is that it would further institutionalize racism, apartheid, and exclusion, while one Palestinian state would strike a decisive blow against them. Any strategic advantages for the one-state solution are merely added bonuses - always welcome, but hardly necessary.
> You seem to think the one state solution is not only more probable than the
> two state solution, but that this is so glaringly obvious that you regard
> everyone who supports the two state solution as somewhere between stupid and
> perfidious.
When have I said anything remotely resembling that?
-- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."