[lbo-talk] Randian does public _dis_service

c b cb31450 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 12:43:16 PDT 2011


"Rand’s ideal man, Howard Roark, the architect of skyscrapers who violently refuses to exist for others...

...Indeed, Congressman Ryan has said the reason he got involved in public service was “by and large” because of Rand, and he has encouraged his staffers to read 'Atlas Shrugged.' "

///////

CB: This is a sort of obvious lie. Public service would be service to others, not at all what Rand taught to do. Randians do public DISservice.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/opinion/17dowd.html?_r=1

Op-Ed Columnist Atlas Without Angelina By MAUREEN DOWD Published: April 16, 2011

WASHINGTON Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

It was Ayn Rand’s nightmare: the president who gave hundreds of billions in hand-outs to homeowners, banks, car executives and various others she would have labeled “moochers” was explaining his vision of why America is great.

“It’s not the size of our skyscrapers,” President Obama told cheering fans at a late-night rally Thursday at Chicago’s Navy Pier. “It’s not the size of our G.D.P.”

It’s not even just because we’re individuals, he said, adding, “We also have this idea that we’re all in this together, that we look out for one another, that I am my brother’s keeper.”

Rand would have considered this warmed over, mommy party, it-takes-a-village piffle.

Obama is antithetical to Rand’s ideal man, Howard Roark, the architect of skyscrapers who violently refuses to exist for others. Paul Ryan, trying to push the cost of Medicare and Medicaid onto the old, the sick and the disabled while rewarding insurance companies with bigger profits, would be more up her alley.

Indeed, Congressman Ryan has said the reason he got involved in public service was “by and large” because of Rand, and he has encouraged his staffers to read “Atlas Shrugged.”

You’d think that our fiscal meltdown would have shown the flaw in Rand’s philosophy. She thought we could derive morals from the markets. But we derived immorality from the markets.

She wrote about Nietzschean superheroes who made things. She died before capitalism evolved into a vampire casino where you could bet against investments you sold to your clients, and make money off something you didn’t own or that existed only on paper.

The sexy Manichean ’toons in the novels of the goddess of capitalism don’t behave unethically. When they blow up things, it’s because they will not be sacrificial victims to evil second-raters.

Greed had a less ennobling effect on real genius capitalists. Instead of fighting the looters, they joined the looters.

What Rand and acolytes like Alan Greenspan failed to realize is that if everyone acts in self-interest and no one takes into account the weakness to the entire system that occurs when everybody indulges in the same kind of risky behavior, the innocent and the guilty are engulfed.

Nevertheless, Rand is blazing back as an icon of the Tea Party, which overlooks her atheism, amorality in romance and vigorous support for abortion.

Tea Party groups are helping to market part one of a low-budget film version of “Atlas Shrugged,” with no stars and none of the campy panache of the Gary Cooper-Patricia Neal movie of “The Fountainhead.” “Atlas Shrugged” aptly opened on Tax Day, getting a rave from Sean Hannity, who said it wouldn’t have been released “had Hollywood liberals gotten their way,” and a dismissive shrug from most critics, even conservatives.

“I will not pan ‘Atlas Shrugged,’ ” P. J. O’Rourke wrote in a pan in The Wall Street Journal. “I don’t have the guts.”

“I’m not sure she’s dead,” he said of Rand.

The 1,200-page novel took Rand 12 years to write. After debuting to searing reviews in 1957, it has been going gangbusters ever since. It was at No. 19 on Amazon Friday night.

Al Ruddy, the charismatic producer of “The Godfather” and “Million Dollar Baby” (and a Democrat), spent decades trying to make Rand’s master work into a movie.

“Dagny Taggart is the greatest role ever written for a woman,” he said in his gravelly voice. “She’s a great executive, she’s gorgeous, and the three greatest guys in the world are all mad about her. Hot stuff about cool geniuses.” In 1975, he wanted to pull together “a dream cast,” with Fay Dunaway as Dagny, Clint Eastwood as Hank Rearden, Robert Redford as John Galt and Alain Delon as Francisco d’Anconia.

He went to New York to talk to Rand, crowding onto a love seat at her agent’s with the tiny objectivist, who loved manly men like Ruddy. She agreed that he could focus on the love story. “That’s all it ever was,” she said.

But she wanted final script approval. “Darlink,” she told him in her Russian accent as she smoked, “I trust you, but the Russians will buy Paramount to destroy my book.”

He refused to give Rand, who started as a tyro Hollywood screenwriter in the days of Cecil B. DeMille, that much control. He kept trying, including for a TNT miniseries with John Aglialoro, an exercise machine mogul who owns the rights (he produced and co-wrote the film that’s out now), hoping for Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Javier Bardem.

But after 9/11, he gave up. “At the end of ‘Atlas Shrugged,’ mills, ships and mines are blown up,” Ruddy said. “And I thought, wait a second, do people really want to see a movie about America being blown up and destroyed?”

He thinks the story will have a second life with stars. “ ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is the most important novel of the 20th century,” Ruddy says, “It will rise again.”‘ A version of this op-ed appeared in print on April 17, 2011, on page WK8 of the New York edition.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list