^^^^^ CB: Thanks , Doug. I wasn't sure whether to bust u by name. Uh Doug, my response was not at all preposterous, but right on. Well, Michael Lind's suggestion is a bit preposterous. You present it as serious , when it should be ridiculed. So my response was , half-tongue in cheek , but used his preposterous context to make some good points. Then ur typical redbaiting response actually , dialectically, allowed me to come up with a good response to such redbaiting which I'll use in the future. Thanks.
On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:12 PM, c b wrote:
> Joe: Democratic party apologetics meets Stalin-style elections?
>
>
> Jack : That sounds like a Keynes-Trotsky type comment - Wall Street
> rentier poses as petit bourgeois revolutionist.
Full context:
> Charles Brown That would be too good to be true. But who thought white supremacist America would elect a Black person in 2008, so maybe it could happen. Republican Party returns to its roots in the Liincolnites.
>
> Doug Henwood Charles, I'm hoping you purposely missed the point.
>
> Charles Brown Wishful thinking on your part , comrade. I get ur point and am contradicting it. Support Obama. I mean he would be nominated by both parties.
>
> Doug Henwood Charles, Democratic party apologetics meets Stalin-style elections?
Lind's piece:
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/21/lind_obama_republican