[lbo-talk] seems 99% sure

Alan Rudy alan.rudy at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 06:53:39 PDT 2011


On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:37 AM, shag carpet bomb <shag at cleandraws.com>wrote:


> if it's not, then Alan, you'd probably better name names. this bullshit
> about not wanting to because you might hurt fee fees is horseshit.
>
>
maybe it wasn't about not hurting feelings… when, again thinking about my history on the list, have I shied away from doing that?

maybe it was because I didn't want to have to parse each contribution that might or might not have been part of the trajectory that was irritating me, can you imagine that I might have other things to do?

once you start down that road the whole terrain explodes and it becomes next to impossible 1) to keep your initial post short of a monograph and 2) folks put in or left out feel directly affronted in some way and the conversation goes nuts. I've been swamped for two weeks and my head just came up out of the slop and wrote something and posted it knowing it was imperfect… sorry it pissed you off.

you keep on imposing positions on me, how come?



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list