[lbo-talk] FW: Banned/boxed books/Info on National Teach In

Gar Lipow gar.lipow at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 13:59:29 PST 2012


A bit of venting rather than a practical suggestion: I wonder if someone can't sue against the so-called conventional history curriculum on grounds that it constitutes "white studies" and "men's studies" and thus violates the statute.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
> [WS:} Another thought - if they can pass laws that amount to
> censorship of school curriculum, this means that a similar strategy
> can be used against the testing-industrial complex.  One idea is to
> pass the "educational choice" state laws that mandate schools to offer
> different alternatives to the standardized testing that students can
> choose from.  For example, students can choose a standardized test, an
> oral examination or a project showing mastery of an academic skill
> targeted in the curriculum.  Standardized testing is perhaps the most
> blatant example of institutional racism in the US (and I do not use
> this term lightly) - so using the legal system to fight it is
> certainly something to consider.
>
> This could be a winning strategy if the anti-evolution crowd can get
> on board on the promise of having a choice of 'alternatives" to
> evolution.
>
> Wojtek
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-- Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598 Static page: http://www.nohairshirts.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list